Legal Opinion

Roye v. United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 8, 2025No. 3:22-cv-01564Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT KARLE ROYE Petitioner, No. 3:22-cv-1564-MPS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RULING ON § 2255 MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE Karle Roye, pro se, seeks to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. ECF No. 1 at 4. For the reasons set forth below, I DENY his motion. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND I assume familiarity with the record in this case and set forth below only a brief summary of the background and the claim. See United States v. Frank, et. al., D. Conn. Case No. 15-CR-…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Yick Man Mui v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API