Legal Opinion

Keigley v. Bench, City Recorder

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1936No. 5838PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELIAS HANSEN, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs, sponsors of the referendum petition, seek a writ of mandamus in this court directing I. G. Bench, the city recorder of Provo City, Utah, to receive and file a petition for a referendum as provided by R. S. Utah 1933, title 25, chap. 10 (25-10-1 et seq.) Application for the writ was made to this court pursuant to section 16 of that act (25-10-16). Upon the filing of plaintiffs’ verified petition, an alternative writ of mandamus was issued directing the defendant to accept and file a petition for a referendum or show cause why he had not done so.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. Welling, Secretary of StateUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Fowler v. GillmanUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Page v. Utah CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State ex rel. Dininny v. City Court of Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State ex rel. Darling v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carter v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Keigley v. Bench, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Utah Power & Light Co. v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Carpenter v. Riverton CityUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Low v. City of MonticelloUtah Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API