Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dininny v. City Court of Salt Lake City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1911No. 2199PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mandamus proceeding by tbe State of Utah, on tbe relation of H. J. Dininny, City Attorney of Salt Lake City, against tbe city Court of Salt Lake City; Ron. J. J. Whitaker, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtStkaup, J.

Upon tbe application and affidavit of tbe city attorney of Salt Lake City, wherein it was averred tbat be and bis assistants were wrongfully prevented and excluded by tbe judge of tbe city court from taking charge of and prosecuting cases, on behalf of tbe city in tbe city court, involving violations of city ordinances, an alternative writ of mandate was issued by us, commanding tbe judge to permit tbe city attorney and bis assistants to appear and prosecute such cases, or show cause. Tbe judge, on the service of writ, permitted tbe city attorney and bis assistants to appear in tbe city…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keigley v. Bench, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Funk v. Inland Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API