Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Braspetro Oil
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 20, 2002No. 97 CIV. 6124(JGK). No. 98 CIV. 3099(JGK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Jüdge.
The Court is entering a Judgment in accordance with the Findings- of Fact and Conclusions of Law dated July 25, 2002. In connection with the entry of that Judgment, the Court received proposed Judgments from the parties together with supporting submissions with respect to the applications for attorneys’ fees and expenses including a detailed affirmation concerning the requests by Braspetro Oil Services Company (“Brasoil”) and the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. (sued herein as The Bank of Tokyo Ltd.-Japan) and Shinsei Bank Limited (successor in interest…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Joann S. Reed, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. A.W. Lawrence & Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Mary C. Quaratino v. Tiffany & Co., Michael Eiring and David WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Tynan Incinerator Co. v. International Fidelity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Fidelity And Guaranty Company v. Braspetro Oil Services CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Braspetro Oil Services Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Braspetro OilDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005