Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Braspetro Oil
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 23, 2005No. 97 CIV, 6124(JGK), 98 CIV. 3099(JGK)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge.
The firm of Cameron & Horbostel (C & H) moves for various relief.
First, C & H moves to withdraw as counsel for defendants Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. — Petrobras and Braspetro Oil Services Company (the “defendants”). This motion is unopposed and - the defendants have retained the firm of Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. to represent them. The motion is therefore granted and Squire, Sanders & Dempsey is substituted as counsel for the defendants.
Second, C & H moves that the Court fix a charging lien pursuant to N.Y. Judiciary Law § 475 and direct that the lien…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of NigeriaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Weltover, Inc. Springdale Enterprises, Inc. Bank Cantrade, A.G. v. Republic of Argentina Banco Central De La ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Letelier v. Republic of ChileCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Greene v. Schmukler (In Re De Berry)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Figueroa v. Ministry for Foreign Affairs of SwedenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016