Legal Opinion

Blakely v. Bearden

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 5, 1929No. 19266PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

The issue at bar is whether a person is a competent witness, in his own behalf in adversary proceedings, over objection, who stands convicted of perjury, but who enjoys a parole containing a restoration to “all the rights of citizenship.”

The issue grew out of the suit below on a redelivery bond given by Blakely when he retained possession of property replejvied by Bearden. Bearden prevailed in a judgment for the recovery of specific personal property and subsequently brought the instant action upon the redelivery bond for alleged default of delivery of the property therein described. Blakely…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Martin v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  3. Palethorp's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Hinton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  5. Klein v. DinkgraveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1849

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goo v. Hee FatHawaii Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Goo v. Hee FatHawaii Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Luna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API