Legal Opinion

Goo v. Hee Fat

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1941No. Nos. 2416 AND 2417PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

COKE, C. J.

These cases, involving the same parties and identical questions, are consolidated by agreement of parties. For a history of the cases prior to our former adjudication of them, see Goo v. Hee Fat, 34 Haw. 123, where this court held that the orders of the circuit court entered January 3, 1935, dismissing plaintiff’s actions for want of prosecution should be set aside and the causes remanded. At a subsequent trial in the circuit court it was stipulated that prior to institution of the proceedings in the circuit court, Goo Wan Hoy assigned the promissory notes…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. CliftSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Reamer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Hester v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of Chavana, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  2. Pioneer Mill Co. v. WardHawaii Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Goo v. GooHawaii Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API