Legal Opinion

Klein v. Dinkgrave

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1849PublishedCited by 2 opinions

from the District Court of Ouachita, Copley, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Slidell, J.

The defendants are sued upon a due bill, signed by them, and payable to John M. Crownriteh, or order. It is endorsed as follows: “Pay the within to N. Klein, for whose account the within was taken. J. M. Crownriteh.” The plaintiff, in addition to the usual averments, alleged, “ that Crownriteh transferred the note to him by writing on the back of it the words above-mentioned, that he acted merely as the plaintiff’s agent in taking the note, and that the same is now, and always has been, the plaintiff’s property.

The defence set up by the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blakely v. BeardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Lafitte v. ShawcrossU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API