Legal Opinion

Cannon v. McDonald

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1980No. 16586PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

The defendants bring this appeal from the district court’s judgment and order granting the plaintiffs’ retirement benefits under the Utah State Retirement Act. We reverse. All statutory references are to Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended.

The plaintiffs, Quayle Cannon, Jr., and Sheldon R. Brewster, are both at least 65 years of age and have served at least four years in the Utah Legislature. Mr. Cannon served in the state legislature from 1941 through 1945 and Mr. Brewster served from 1937 through 1943, and 1957 through 1960. Their applications for retirement benefits…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crist v. J. H. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. VigilUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Utah State Road Commission v. FribergUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re the Disconnection of Certain Territory From Highland CityUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Utah State Bar v. Summerhayes & Hayden, Public AdjustersUtah Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API