Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Stone

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Ninth Judicial District, Siskiyou County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.

This is an action for the specific performance of an award made by arbitrators," under and in pursuance of an agreement made by the parties. The defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The Court sustained the demurrer, holding that the remedy of the plaintiff was not by a suit for a specific performance, but an action to recover the penalty of five hundred dollars stipulated in the agreement, submitting the matters in controversy to the arbitrators, and agreeing to abide by and perform the award. A final…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chamberlain v. BlueIndiana Supreme Court · 1843

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Rigs v. SokolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Chicago M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. StewartU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Fletcher v. ArnettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API