Legal Opinion
Hutchinson v. Sperry
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Action to dissolve a partnership and for an accounting.
1Opinion of the CourtNewburger, J.
In 1897 plaintiff and defendant enteréd into a partnership under an oral agreement to continue for no fixed period in the trading stamp business under the firm name of Sperry & Hutchinson. Subsequently a corporation known as the Sperry & Hutchinson Corporation was formed, to which certain of the assets of the partnership were transferred, the firm retaining the business in several of the cities and states in the United States. It also appears that the International Trading Stamp Company had transferred to the firm certain assets which were not included in the bill of sale from the partnership…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Gilmore v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Coit v. . Campbell, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Groesbeck v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hutchinson v. SperryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913