Save Our Sonoran, Inc. v. Flowers
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARTONE, District Judge.
I
The court has had under submission plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction. We have read the motion, the federal defendants’ response, 56th & Lone Mountain’s response, and plaintiffs reply. We have examined the administrative record, including the Environmental Assessment prepared by the Corps of Engineers. We have heard oral argument, and we now set forth our findings and rulings under Rule 52(a), Fed.R.Civ.P.
This is an action brought by Save our Sonoran, Inc. against the Corps of Engineers and 56th & Lone Mountain, a real estate developer, seeking judicial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dan Marius Andreiu v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Stewart v. PottsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
- Sylvester v. U.S. Army Corps Of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Save Our Sonoran, Inc. v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Save Our Sonoran, Inc. v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Weiss v. KempthorneDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- Chang v. County of SiskiyouDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.