Legal Opinion

Save Our Sonoran, Inc. v. Flowers

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 30, 2002No. CV-02-00761-PHX-SRBPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARTONE, District Judge.

I

The court has had under submission plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction. We have read the motion, the federal defendants’ response, 56th & Lone Mountain’s response, and plaintiffs reply. We have examined the administrative record, including the Environmental Assessment prepared by the Corps of Engineers. We have heard oral argument, and we now set forth our findings and rulings under Rule 52(a), Fed.R.Civ.P.

This is an action brought by Save our Sonoran, Inc. against the Corps of Engineers and 56th & Lone Mountain, a real estate developer, seeking judicial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dan Marius Andreiu v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Stewart v. PottsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
  3. Sylvester v. U.S. Army Corps Of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Save Our Sonoran, Inc. v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. Save Our Sonoran, Inc. v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Weiss v. KempthorneDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
  5. Chang v. County of SiskiyouDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API