Legal Opinion
Chang v. County of Siskiyou
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 28, 2025No. 2:22-cv-01378Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Ger Chong Ze Chang, et al., No. 2:22-cev-01378-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. County of Siskiyou, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 For the reasons below, plaintiffs’ motion to modify the preliminary injunction is denied, 18 | and the parties are ordered to show cause why the preliminary injunction should not be limited 19 | to plaintiffs Russell Mathis and Mai Nou Vang only, as specified at the conclusion of this order. 20 | I. BACKGROUND 21 In previous orders, this court (1) granted plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brown v. PlataSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- City Of Los Angeles, Harbor Division, A Municipal Corporation, Petitioner-Appellant v. Santa Monica BaykeeperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Larry Melancon v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Leslie Salt Co., a Delaware Corporation Cargill, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Sharp v. WestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.