Arrell v. Davies
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
Injured in an automobile accident, tbe respondent brought suit for damages and recovered a verdict of $17,390. A motion for a new trial was denied on condition that be consent to a reduction of tbe verdict to $10,390. Such consent was filed and tbe case comes here on appeal from tbe order.
Tbe sole reason for asking for a reversal is that tbe verdict is excessive and must have been given under tbe influence of passion and prejudice.
Respondent’s injuries were received when a Ford car be was driving was struck by an automobile driven by one of tbe appellants. Tbe left front side of tbe…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Merrill v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Quinn v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Ott v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Gibson v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Larson v. Wisconsin Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cox v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Cox v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929