Legal Opinion

Arrell v. Davies

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 1927No. 26,089PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Injured in an automobile accident, tbe respondent brought suit for damages and recovered a verdict of $17,390. A motion for a new trial was denied on condition that be consent to a reduction of tbe verdict to $10,390. Such consent was filed and tbe case comes here on appeal from tbe order.

Tbe sole reason for asking for a reversal is that tbe verdict is excessive and must have been given under tbe influence of passion and prejudice.

Respondent’s injuries were received when a Ford car be was driving was struck by an automobile driven by one of tbe appellants. Tbe left front side of tbe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merrill v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Quinn v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Ott v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Gibson v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Larson v. Wisconsin Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cox v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Cox v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API