Russell v. Department of Human Rights
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.
George Russell appeals from an order on writ of review in which the trial court affirmed the decision of the Seattle Department of Human Rights and a hearing examiner that Russell and First Impressions Printing, Inc., had discriminated against Doris Slumkoski. We affirm.
I
On March 27, 1985, Doris Slumkoski filed a verified employment charge with the Seattle Department of Human Rights (Department), alleging that her former employer, First Impressions Printing, Inc. (First Impressions), engaged in unlawful employment practices against her. The charge alleged in part that First Impressions…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Glus v. G. C. Murphy Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Haley v. Medical Disciplinary BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- 22 Fair empl.prac.cas. 338, 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,679 Abraisto Vincent Romero v. Union Pacific Railroad, a Corporation, United Transportation Union and Association, H. H. Brandt, R. B. Murdock, D. D. Sorenson, and A. L. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kahn v. SalernoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Aponte v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Cascade Court Ltd. Partnership v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Dana's Housekeeping, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Conway v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.