Legal Opinion

United States v. William E. Magness

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 7, 1995No. 95-1609PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

William E. Magness appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress both evidence obtained during the search of his residence and his confession. Magness entered a conditional plea of guilty to thirteen counts of possession of a destructive device in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5861(d), and 5871, and reserved his right to appeal the court’s denial of his motion to suppress. On appeal, he argues that he was arrested without probable cause and that both his confession and his consent to the search of his residence were involuntary. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Billy Lee JorgensenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Lloyd Archer, United States of America v. Beverly Drummond, United States of America v. Marva TinglingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Argentra CodyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Robert Eugene OakleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. Henry Lovejoy, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. ConnerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  5. State v. SondergaardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API