Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Crowell & Thurlow S. S. Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided February 21, 1924No. 7512PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Rule
56 provides that:
“In any suit the claimant * * * shall be entitled to bring in any other * * * person who may be partially or wholly liable, either to the libelant or to such claimant * * * growing out of the same matter. This shall *880be done by petition. * * * Such, petition shall contain suitable allegations showing such liability * *■ * and that such person ought to be proceeded against in the same suit for such damages. * * * ”
The petition alleges that the Western Stevedore Company was the employer of libelant; that the appliances were in its…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- The AdaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Union Fish Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Alaska Packers' Ass'n v. DomenicoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- D. M. Picton & Co. v. EastesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- DC Andrews & Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Wallace v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
- Gronvold v. SuryanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1935
- El OrienteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.