Legal Opinion
Gronvold v. Suryan
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 9, 1935No. 13466PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
Libelants seek to recover damages on breach of warranty not expressed in the charter agreement which is sought to be introduced by alleged statements ante charter party agreement as matter of inducement.
It is further alleged in the third amended libel that after the execution of the charter party and upon delivery of the vessel to the libelants, for installing of oil tanks, etc., that libelants, preliminary to reconstruction and installation of the tanks and equipment referred to in the charter party, stated to the respondent that they proposed to enter into the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- The Steamer EclipseSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. SheaSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- The CorsairSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- The AdaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alaska Barge and Transport, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. Coast Manufacturing & Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- D. M. Picton & Co. v. EastesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Flota Maritima Browning De Cuba, Sociadad Anonima v. SnoblCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Armstrong Cork Co. v. Farrell Line, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.