Legal Opinion

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports

Decided December 7, 1988No. 88-501Published

1Opinion of the Court

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP Attorney General ------------------------------ OPINION : : of : : JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP : No. 88-501 Attorney General : : DECEMBER 7, 1988 RODNEY O. LILYQUIST : Deputy Attorney General : ----------------------------------------------------------------- THE HONORABLE MICHAEL H. KRAUSNICK, COUNTY COUNSEL, STANISLAUS COUNTY, has requested an opinion on the following questions with respect to a city annexation proceeding: 1. Are the city and the county required to reach an agreement for…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. French v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. CraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API