Legal Opinion
Loran v. Iszler
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 4, 1985No. Civ. 10854PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
Ted Loran appeals a district court judgment dismissing his damages action against Harry Iszler, holding that Iszler was entitled to absolute judicial immunity as an administrative hearing officer with the North Dakota State Highway Department. We conclude that Iszler is entitled to immunity and affirm the judgment of dismissal.
Loran was arrested for driving while under the influence. He requested an administrative hearing on the proposed suspension of his driving privileges, pursuant to N.D.C.C. § 39-20-05. After the hearing, the hearing officer, Harry Iszler, rendered a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pulliam v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnny King v. Robert H. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. Chase Securities, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Perry Center, Inc. v. HeitkampNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Riemers v. O'HALLORANNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Messiha v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Richmond v. HaneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.