Anderson v. Reames
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Appropriate proceedings were instituted in the Union chancery court by appellees, J. B. Reames and H. O. Reames, styled “Operating Plaintiffs,” and a large number of other parties styled “Public Plaintiffs,” to restrain appellants and other defendants from enclosing the shore, or dock site, and from interfering with the rights of appellees in the use and occupancy as a camp site, of a strip of land approximately 200 feet wide, along the west shore of Grand Mere Lake in Union county, Arkansas.
The principal issue presented on the trial below, and here on appeal, relates to riparian rights on…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tiffany v. . Town of Oyster BayNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Village of Pewaukee v. SavoyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
- Hedges v. . West Shore R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Barboro v. BoyleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest v. HassellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- State of California v. Superior Court (Lyon)California Supreme Court · 1981
- Flynn v. BeiselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Arkansas River Rights Committee v. Echubby Lake Hunting ClubCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.