Legal Opinion
United States v. Siegel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 27, 1957PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYAN, District Judge.
Defendants move, pursuant to Rule 12(b) (2), Fed.Rules CrimProe., 18 U.S. C.A., to dismiss all twelve counts of the indictment against them on the grounds that each fails to state an offense.
The indictment arises out of an investigation by a grand jury in this district to discover whether (a) one Harvey Matusow had testified falsely in either or both of two unrelated trials in which he was a witness for t1' "> prosecution, or (b) whether Matusow nad committed perjury in executing affidavits recanting his testimony in these two trials, and (c) whether there had been a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Raymond J. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Paul WalasekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Herbert A. Howard and Elmer Gary RitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Patricia Ann Essex, Also Known as Patricia Ann ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. BonannoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.