Legal Opinion
James M. Mullikin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1992No. 90-6456PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOWD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant-appellant the United States of America appeals the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee James M. Mullikin, Jr. (“Mullikin”) in this tax refund suit. Mulli-kin, an accountant, prepared eight quarterly employment tax returns, Forms 941, for Vaneo International, Inc. (“Vaneo”) for the years 1982 and 1983. Mullikin also prepared nine Wage and Tax Statements, W-2 Forms, for Vaneo employees in 1982, and ten W-2 Forms in 1983. In preparing the tax documents, Mullikin failed to include the portion of wages paid…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Morris WeintraubCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- John A. Sage v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Donnell R. Mattingly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- National Mining Association v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- John M. Capozzi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MohnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- In Re James E. Mitchell and Diane C. Mitchell, Debtors. James E. Mitchell Diane C. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- 3M Co. (Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing) v. BrownerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.