Legal Opinion

Quill v. Schlichter

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 1, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A reading of the pleadings discloses that complainants, the executors of Henry H. Ottens, deceased, desire this court to construe his last will and testament and to declare complainants' rights, duties, and liabilities thereunder.

By stipulation, the parties agreed that the matter be disposed of by me on briefs submitted by all the parties in interest. A reading of these briefs discloses that the real difficulty confronting the executors requires that they be advised as to the legal classification of the bequests set forth in the will, and a determination of priorities as between the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re LowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1928
  2. Kearns v. KearnsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910
  3. Weed v. HogeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  4. Spinney v. EatonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
  5. Chemical Bank and Trust Co. v. BarnettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Byrne v. ByrneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
  2. Litcher v. Trust Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Estate of Short v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  4. Busch v. PlewsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Berry v. President, C., Bank of Manhattan Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API