Legal Opinion

Berry v. President, C., Bank of Manhattan Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 29, 1943No. Docket 149/155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this suit the widow of Samuel Berry seeks a construction of that part of his will which directs the executors to purchase an annuity for her. The clause in question reads as follows:

"Third: I authorize, empower and direct the executor of my said will hereinafter named, to set aside and expend a sum for the purchase of an annuity from a reliable insurance company to produce an annual income of Three thousand ($3,000) Dollars, and I direct that said sum be paid in equal monthly installments to my wife, MARY JANE BERRY, during the term of her natural life. I further direct that in no event…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Genung v. BestNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  2. Brearley v. BrearleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1852
  3. Executors of Marshall v. HadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1892
  4. Chemical Bank and Trust Co. v. BarnettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  5. In re the Estate of OakleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morgenthaler v. First Atlantic National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Drown v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In Re Barnhart)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
  3. Ketcham v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API