Legal Opinion
Rowe v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 28, 2006PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
892 A.2d 694 (2006)
383 N.J. Super. 442
Robert ROWE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC., and Roche Laboratories Inc., Defendants-Respondents.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 6, 2005.
Decided February 28, 2006.
Brian J. Molloy, Woodbridge, argued the cause for appellant (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Mr. Molloy of counsel; Jeffrey J. Brookner and Mr. Molloy on the brief).
Paul W. Schmidt, Boonton, (Covington & Burling) of the Washington, D.C. bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondents (Gibbons, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger &…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rowe v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Mastondrea v. Occidental Hotels ManagementNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- In re Vioxx Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2006
- PEOPLE FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT v. RobertsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- International Union v. Merck & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.