Legal Opinion

Quong Hing v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 22, 1950No. 54617; protest 80269-K (New York)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this protest is described on the invoice as “Celluloid Chopstiek” and was assessed with duty at the rate of 50 cents per pound and 40 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1539 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 1539 (b)), which, so far as pertinent, read as follows:

Par. 1539. * * *(b) Laminated products * * *; manufactures wholly or in chief value of any of the foregoing, or of any other product of which any synthetic resin or resin-like substance is the chief binding agent, * * *.

The protest claim is for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Protests 58030-K of Fan Co.United States Customs Court · 1944
  2. Protest 25325-K of Tuck High & Co.United States Customs Court · 1946
  3. Protests 102840-K of Mimosa American Corp.United States Customs Court · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davies v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Wing Woh Chong Hing Kee Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API