Legal Opinion

Protests 102840-K of Mimosa American Corp.

United States Customs Court

Decided November 30, 1945No. 50728PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was agreed that from an analysis of merchandise analyzed by a Government chemist, synthetic resin was the component of chief value; that the articles in question are not laminated, nor made of laminated products; and that the synthetic resin did not act as a binding agent. Upon the agreed facts, it was held that the merchandise was excluded from classification under paragraph 1539 (b), following Lee & Schiffer, Inc. v. United States (12 Cust. Ct. 183, C. D. 850). There being no provision in the act for manufactures composed wholly or in chief value of synthetic…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rolls Razor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  2. Lee & Schiffer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Prepac, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Quong Hing v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  4. J. Jolles Studios, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  5. J. Jolles Studios, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API