Protests 102840-K of Mimosa American Corp.
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Oliver, P. J.
It was agreed that from an analysis of merchandise analyzed by a Government chemist, synthetic resin was the component of chief value; that the articles in question are not laminated, nor made of laminated products; and that the synthetic resin did not act as a binding agent. Upon the agreed facts, it was held that the merchandise was excluded from classification under paragraph 1539 (b), following Lee & Schiffer, Inc. v. United States (12 Cust. Ct. 183, C. D. 850). There being no provision in the act for manufactures composed wholly or in chief value of synthetic…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rolls Razor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- Lee & Schiffer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
3Cited by5 opinions
- Prepac, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Quong Hing v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- J. Jolles Studios, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- J. Jolles Studios, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950