Legal Opinion
In Re State Ex Rel. Hilbig
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided December 16, 1998No. 04-98-00797-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL W. GREEN, Justice.
The defendants and real parties in interest were convicted of driving while intoxicated (DWI), at the felony level, and were sentenced to regular probation. After the defendants completed a portion of their probation, the respondent terminated their sentences, set aside the judgments, and dismissed the indictments. Several months later, the State filed petitions for writs of mandamus and prohibition, asserting the respondent had no authority to terminate the probationary periods under section 20, article 42.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. We agree with the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rivercenter Associates v. RiveraTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Holmes v. Honorable Court of Appeals for the Third DistrictCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Callahan v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Smith v. FlackCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- State v. MasonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vanderhorst v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2001
- Tietz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
- State v. Morgan, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2003
- Daniel Gordon Travis v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.