Legal Opinion

Tietz v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided February 13, 2008No. 04-07-00167-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.

In cause numbers 2006-CR-5028 and 2006-CR-5029, Louis Tietz was indicted as a habitual offender in two felony cases of driving while intoxicated (DWI). He filed motions to quash the indictments. After his motions to quash were overruled by the trial court, he pled no contest to the two offenses and true to the habitual offender allegations, and was sentenced to twenty-five years confinement in each cause, to be served concurrently. Tietz appeals the overruling of his motions to quash the indictments.

Discussion

A. Motions to Quash Indictments

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Getts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. State v. MasonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. In Re State Ex Rel. Hilbig, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Edward Banister v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2017
  2. George Michael Carter A/K/A Michael George Carter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  3. George Michael Carter A/K/A Michael George Carter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  4. Joe Antonio Luna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2021
  5. Miguel Medrano A/K/A Migeul Medrano v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API