Legal Opinion

Davis v. Equibank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 25, 1992No. 1764PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order granting appellees’ preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and dismissing appellant’s complaint. Appellant raises one issue for our consideration, whether appellant stated a cause of action for which relief could be granted? We affirm.

The facts of relevance, briefly stated, are: on January 12, 1990, an Equibank branch located in the Hazelwood section of Pittsburgh was the subject of a robbery. During the course of the police investigation an officer displayed a number of photographs to the teller involved, appellee Male-sky. Appellee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alumni Ass'n, Delta Zeta Zeta of Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Turner v. MellonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Shires v. CobbOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Lafontaine v. Family Drug Stores, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1976
  5. Manis v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Griffiths v. Cigna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Jaindl v. MohrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Jaindl v. MohrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Morris v. T.D. BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  5. Foley v. Univ. of Dayton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API