Legal Opinion

Jaindl v. Mohr

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 1995PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTEMURO, Justice.

Appellant, Tamilee Mohr Haaf, seeks review of a Superior Court order which affirmed the entry of summary judgment by the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County in favor of Appellees, Fred Jaindl, Mark Jaindl, and Margaret Wehinger. The sole issue raised by Appellant is whether the Superior Court erred in concluding that her cause of action for negligent procurement of criminal proceedings was invalid as a matter of law. For the following reasons, we affirm the entry of summary judgment.

Appellant was employed as a secretary from February 20, 1986, to March 6, 1986, at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Campbell v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Motheral v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Turner v. MellonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Little v. York County Earned Income Tax BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Jaindl v. MohrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. University of ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. In Re SmithCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Foster v. UPMC South Side HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Miketic v. BaronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Reynolds v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API