Legal Opinion

Rood v. Rosen (In re Rood)

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 29, 2012No. Civil Action No. DKC 11-3059PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge.

Appellants Robert F. Rood, IV, and Charles Timothy Jewell appeal from a November 4, 2011, judgment against them in a bankruptcy adversary proceeding in accordance with a memorandum of decision issued September 26, 2011.1 The issues are fully briefed and the court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6, no hearing being deemed necessary. For the reasons that follow, the judgment will be affirmed.

1. Background

A. Events Prior to the Adversary Complaint

Appellee Southern Management Corporation Retirement Trust (“SMCRT”) is a pension plan that…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Atlantic Automotive Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  2. Charles Ivey, III v. First Citizens Bank & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  3. LeCompte v. Manekin Construction, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
  4. GAB Enterprises, Inc. v. Rocky Gorge Development, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. U.S. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Phase 2 Invs. Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API