Legal Opinion

State v. Clausell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2001No. 98-213PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Amuir Sekou Clausell appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, on a jury verdict finding him guilty of deliberate homicide. We affirm.

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err when it admitted expert testimony

of Dr. Dwayne Schultz?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err when it denied Clausell’s motion for a directed verdict of acquittal?

¶5 3. Did the District Court erroneously instruct the jury on the definition of “purposely?”

¶6 4. Did the State prejudice Clausell’s right to a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Anderson v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. WeaverMontana Supreme Court · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. BristerMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. BuckMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. BaileyMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Clausell v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. CrawfordMontana Supreme Court · 2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API