Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2004No. 03-118PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray

¶1 James C. Bailey (Bailey) appeals from the judgment entered by the Ninth Judicial District Court, Pondera County, on his conviction and sentence for two counts of felony incest. We affirm.

¶2 Bailey raises the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in granting the

prosecution’s motion to add an expert to its witness list four days prior to trial?

¶4 2. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in allowing Dr. Todd Gianarelli to testify regarding his opinion that M.C. and A.B. had been sexually abused?

¶5 3. Did the District Court err in denying Bailey’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PritchettMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. ClausellMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. HayworthMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Perdue v. Gagnon Farms, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. HicksMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. BuckMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Jones v. Montana University SystemMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. PassmoreMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. GiddingsMontana Supreme Court · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API