Dye v. Carmichael Produce Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Bartholomew Circuit Court; Hugh Wickens, Judge. Action by Elam Dye and Edward Bennett, doing business as partners under the firm name of Dye and Bennett, against the Carmichael Produce Company. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHottel, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in appellee’s favor in an action brought against it by appellants for damages alleged to have resulted to their business on account of certain alleged conduct of appellee in connection therewith. A demurrer to appellants’ complaint was sustained. This ruling was properly excepted to by appellant and- is here assigned as error and relied on for reversal.
The averments of the complaint necessary to an understanding of our disposition of the question presented for review are in substance as follows: On and prior to October 14, 1918, appellants were partners in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Plant v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Delz v. Winfree, Norman & PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Knight & Jillson Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fort Wayne Cleaners & Dyers Ass'n v. PriceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
- Orion's Belt, Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1977
- Bochnowski v. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Lipnik v. EhaltIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Bochnowski v. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988