Lipnik v. Ehalt
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Clark Circuit Court; William Ridley, Special Judge. Action by Adam Ehalt against Nathan Lipnik. From -a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.
This is an action by appellee to recover damages, alleged to have been sustained by reason of the destruction by appellant of a certain frame building which appellee was occupying as a tenant. The complaint is in a single paragraph. Appellant filed his respective motions, to strike out certain parts thereof, and to make the same more specific, each of which was overruled. He then filed a demurrer thereto for want of sufficient facts, which being overruled, was followed by the filing of an answer consisting of six paragraphs. The first is a general denial. The second alleges that the frame…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Baumgartner v. HastyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Schmidt v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Gebhart v. BurkettIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Robinson v. BaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Moyer v. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bird v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Clawson v. BlackIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Standard Life Insurance v. GrigsbyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923