Legal Opinion

Franko v. Crosby

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 17, 1935No. Gen. No. 8,838PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hueeman

This was an action brought by appellee under the Injuries Act, Cahill’s St. ch. 70, ¶ 1 et seq., to recover damages for the next of kin of Martin Yirant because of his alleged wrongful death. The appellant was the sheriff of Tazewell county. Trial resulted in a verdict in favor of appellee for $5,000, and this appeal is prosecuted from the judgment of the court upon the verdict.

The deceased, Martin Yirant, lived with appellee, his sister, and her husband Frank Franko, together with his brother, Frank Yirant. These parties had lived together in the home of Frank Franko for a number of years…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wabash Railroad v. BillingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Chicago Union Traction Co. v. LauthIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. People v. BimboIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People v. ChrfrikasIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Mugaviro v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GrahamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hann v. BrooksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  3. In Re Air Crash Disaster Near Chicago, Illinois, On May 15, 1979.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Waters v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Chicago v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API