Legal Opinion

Winamaki v. Umpqua Bank

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 2022No. A175148PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

588 Argued and submitted October 12, affirmed November 9, 2022, petition for review denied March 30, 2023 ( 370 Or 828) Angela WINAMAKI, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UMPQUA BANK, Defendant-Respondent. Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CV52252; A175148

521 P3d 846

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant Umpqua Bank after the trial court granted Umpqua Bank’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims, brought on her own behalf and on behalf of a proposed class of plaintiffs, for breach of con- tract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. James Lossia, Jr. v. Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Tomlinson v. Metropolitan Pediatrics, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. D. J. M.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tharp v. Northwest BankDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API