Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Pollard

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 15, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00848Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RHONDA FITZGERALD, an individual, Case No.: 20cv848 JM(NLS) and on behalf of all persons similarly 11 situated, ORDER ON MOTION FOR 12 SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 MARCUS POLLARD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants C. 18 Moore, M. Pollard, A. Jackson, C. Mann-Little, and H. Cruz. (Doc. No. 41.) The motion 19 has been fully briefed and the court held oral argument on August 23, 2021. For the reasons 20 set forth below, the motion is…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API