Legal Opinion
United States v. Falzone
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 24, 1991No. Cr-89-141APublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ARCARA, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The defendants, Leonard Falzone and Salvatore “Sammy” Spano, are charged by indictment with various violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), (d). Defendant Spano is also charged with money laundering and conspiracy to launder money in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956, 371, respectively, and three counts of filing false tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206.
Defendant Falzone is represented in this action by Mr. Harold Boreanaz, Esq., of the law firm of Boreanaz, Carra and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. GottiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- United States v. Tejbir S. OberoiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1999
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2001
- United States v. ReynosoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.