Legal Opinion

Gregersen v. Blume

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 1987No. 16506PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This appeal presents a religious challenge to the secular authority of the state to regulate a commercial activity. Bill Blume, the proprietor of a business known as “Ye Olde Contract Barber” or “Bill’s Barbershop,” contends that the State of Idaho is infringing impermissibly upon his constitutionally protected religious beliefs by requiring him to obtain a license and a certificate of registration as a barber. Confronted with Blume’s refusal to be regulated, the Idaho Bureau of Occupational Licenses and the Board of Barber Examiners sought and received from the district court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Edwards v. AguillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. KollerIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Tanner v. HeiseDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1987
  3. State v. BlumeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State ex rel. Department of Labor & Industrial Services v. HillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. State v. CrismanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API