Eusterman v. Northwest Permanente, P.C.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.
Plaintiff, a physician, appeals a summary judgment in favor of defendants Northwest Permanente, P.C. (Northwest), plaintiffs former employer, and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest (Kaiser), a provider of managed care services. In essence, plaintiffs theory is that Northwest terminated his employment because of defendants’ concerns about his approval of time off for injured workers, his changes in other doctors’ diagnoses, and his efforts to obtain an osteopathic treatment for a patient, and that such concerns were motivated by finances, not medical judgment. Plaintiff claims that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Brown v. Transcon LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Love v. Polk County Fire DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Huber v. Oregon Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Gibson v. BankofierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Sharma v. Providence Health & Services-OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Giuliano v. Anchorage Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.