N. H. Warren & Co. v. Raben
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Hamilton county. Heard below before Tiffany, J., sitting for Norval, J. cited, as to the account: 2 Perry, Trusts, p. 474, sec. 821; Blauvelt v. Ackerman, 23 N. J. Eq., 495; Albertson v. State, 9 Neb., 431; Taylor, Ev., 344; Powell’s Ev., 294; 1 Green!., Ev.,sec. 79; Christy v. Douglas, Wright [O.], 485; Abbott, Trial Ev., 461; 1 Wait, A. & D., 193-4; Langdon v. Roane, 6 Ala., 518. As to the construction of the contract: 2 Pom., Eq.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the district court for Hamilton county. Heard below before Tiffany, J., sitting for Norval, J. cited, as to the account: 2 Perry, Trusts, p. 474, sec. 821; Blauvelt v. Ackerman, 23 N. J. Eq., 495; Albertson v. State, 9 Neb., 431; Taylor, Ev., 344; Powell’s Ev., 294; 1 Green!., Ev.,sec. 79; Christy v. Douglas, Wright [O.], 485; Abbott, Trial Ev., 461; 1 Wait, A. & D., 193-4; Langdon v. Roane, 6 Ala., 518. As to the construction of the contract: 2 Pom., Eq. Jur., p. 480-2, secs. 957, 958; Story, Agency, sec. 210; Catron v. Shepherd, 8 Neb., 315, 316; Masters v. Freeman, 17 O. St.,…
1Opinion of the Court
Cobb, Ch. J.
The appellants are a commission firm of grain dealers at Chicago, Illinois, and were owners of a grain elevator at Aurora, in this state, which the appellee leased and operated under a joint contract with the owners and on their joint account.-
The contract was made October 20, 1883, between Nathan H. Warren, Cyrus T. Warren, and Charles C. Warren, composing the firm of N. H. Warren & Co., party of the first part, and John Raben, of Aurora, Nebraska, party of the second part; and the same “ witnesseth, that for and in consideration of the agreement hereinafter set forth, the party…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hart v. HartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Norcross v. GingeryNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
- Murphy v. N. H. Warren & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- N. H. Warren & Co. v. RabenNebraska Supreme Court · 1895