Legal Opinion

Murphy v. N. H. Warren & Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1898No. 8101PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court of Saline county. Heard below before Hastings, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

July 1, 1891, N. H. Warren & Co., an Illinois copart-nership, owned three grain elevators in this state-r-one located at Crete, one at Dorchester, and one at Friend. N. H. Warren & Co., as party of the first part, and George M. Murphy, as party of the second part, entered into an agreement in writing as follows:

“Witnesseth, that for and in consideration of the agreements hereinafter set forth the party of the first part agrees to furnish the free use of their steam-power elevator at Dorchester and their horse-power elevator at Crete, in the state of Nebraska, fully equipped and ready…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coleman v. PearceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  2. Bruggerman v. TrueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  3. N. H. Warren & Co. v. RabenNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Porter v. CurryIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Norcross v. GingeryNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Miles v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Murphy v. N. H. Warren & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API