Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Sweere v. Crookham

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1980No. SC 26515PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.

The issue in this mandamus proceeding is whether the Oregon long-arm statute, ORS 14.035, permits an Oregon court to acquire personal jurisdiction over plaintiff/relator Joseph Sweere.

The underlying litigation involves a contractual dispute between Rusth Industries, an Oregon corporation, and W-P Distributors, a North Dakota corporation, with a principal place of business in Minnesota. The complaint alleges that Rusth appointed W-P as a distributor of Rusth products in a territory outside the State of Oregon. Pursuant to that agreement W-P purchased a quantity of Rusth products, which were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. State Ex Rel. White Lumber Sales, Inc. v. SulmonettiOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. Ware v. HieberOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State Ex Rel. Academy Press, Ltd. v. BeckettOregon Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Alabama Waterproofing Co., Inc. v. HanbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Mueller v. BenningOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Jones v. CrookhamOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. La Manufacture Francaise Des Pneumatiques Michelin v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Robinson v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API