Legal Opinion
Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency v. Whittaker Corporation
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 6, 2022No. 2:18-cv-06825Unknown
1Opinion
Case 2:18-cv-06825-SB-RAO Document 524 Filed 06/06/22 Page 1 of 42 Page ID #:44929 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:18-cv-06825-SB-RAO 11 SANTA CLARITA VALLEY WATER FINDINGS OF FACT AND AGENCY, 12 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 16 WHITTAKER CORPORATION, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency (Plaintiff) is a regional water 22 agency that supplies water throughout the Santa Clarita Valley in California. Plaintiff 23 operates a number of supply wells that draw water from a source that has been…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. William M. Davis, Ashland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Cordiano v. Metacon Gun Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Contractors Ass'n of Eastern Pennsylvania v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Greater Westchester Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.