Legal Opinion

State v. Pelletier

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 2, 1996PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDMAN, Justice.

Michael Pelletier appeals from the judgments entered on jury verdicts in the Superi- or Court (Aroostook County, Pierson, J.) finding him guilty of two counts of unlawful trafficking in scheduled drugs, 17-A M.R.SA. § 1103 (1983 & Supp.1995), and two counts of aggravated trafficking in scheduled drugs, 17-A M.R.SA. § 1105(1)(C) (Supp. 1995). Pelletier challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence and the sufficiency of the evidence. He further argues that certain comments made by the State during its opening statement denied him a fair trial. We affirm the judgments.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. DolloffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. State v. ChesnelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. State v. KellySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. State v. WinslowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  5. State v. SullivanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API