Kimmel v. Eastern Coal & Mining Co.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lively, Judge:
Having overruled the demurrer to the bill, the court certified its ruling for review. Is the bill sufficient ? This is the question underlying and controlling the various queries and points certified.
The bill charges in substance: (1) That defendant is a foreign corporation with authorized capital stock of $1,000,-000.00, of which from $250,000.00 to $300,000.00 has been sold including $2,500.00 to plaintiff, on which it guaranteed 8% dividends, with the agreement that it would furnish its stockholders coal at cost of- production plus thirty cents per ton, and would pay no…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Robertson v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
- Hughes v. Antietam Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
- Huffstetler v. Our Home Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
- Love v. TeterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
- First National Bank v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Janssen v. Carolina Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
- International Harvester Co. of America v. SolazoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
- De Stubner v. Microid ProcessWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
- Kimmell v. Eastern Coal & Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925