Legal Opinion

Love v. Teter

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1884PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Snyder, Judge:

By deed, dated October -3,-1868, Stephen Arnold conveyed to his daughter, Mary Jane, the wife of Byron Love, a tract of two hundred acres of land in Barbour county, “subject to this condition, that the deed shall not operate as a conveyance of the legal title to said land or the right to possession thereof until after the death of the said Stephen Arnold.”

On June 8, 1871, after the aforesaid deed had been recorded, the said Byron Love and wife, by deed duly acknowledged and recorded, demised, granted -and leased the said land to W. B. Teter, W. C. Okey, D. D. T. Farnesworth, G.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ranney v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Perkins v. LougeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gaddy Engineering Co. v. Bowles Rice McDavid Graff & Love, LLPWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Pickens v. KniselyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Cottrell v. NurnbergerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Croston v. EMAX OIL CO., a VIRGINIA CORP.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Harrington v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1896

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API